The Guardians

  Copyright & Information

  The Guardians

  First published in 1955

  Copyright: John Stewart Literary Management Ltd. 1955-2012

  All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior permission of the publisher. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages.

  The right of J.I.M. Stewart to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted.

  This edition published in 2012 by House of Stratus, an imprint of

  Stratus Books Ltd., Lisandra House, Fore Street, Looe,

  Cornwall, PL13 1AD, UK.

  Typeset by House of Stratus.

  A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library and the Library of Congress.

  EAN ISBN Edition

  0755130286 9780755130283 Print

  0755133196 9780755133192 Kindle

  0755133501 9780755133505 Epub

  This is a fictional work and all characters are drawn from the author’s imagination.

  Any resemblance or similarities to persons either living or dead are entirely coincidental.

  www.houseofstratus.com

  About the Author

  John Innes Mackintosh Stewart (who also wrote as Michael Innes) was born in Edinburgh where his father was Director of Education. He attended Edinburgh Academy before going up to Oriel College, Oxford where he was awarded a first class degree in English and won the Matthew Arnold Memorial Prize and was named a Bishop Frazer scholar. After a short interlude travelling with AJP Taylor in Austria, including studying Freudian psychoanalysis for a year, he embarked on an edition of Florio’s translation of Montaigne’s Essays. This subsequently helped him secure a post teaching English at Leeds University.

  In 1932, Stewart married Margaret Hardwick, who practised medicine, and they subsequently had three sons and two daughters. By 1935, he had been awarded the Jury Chair at the University of Adelaide in Australia as Professor of English and had also completed his first detective novel, ‘Death at the President’s Lodging’, published under the pseudonym ‘Michael Innes’. This was an immediate success and part of a long running series centred on ‘Inspector Appleby’, his primary character when writing as ‘Innes’. There were almost fifty titles completed under the ‘Innes’ banner during his career.

  In 1946, he returned to the UK and spent two years at Queen’s University in Belfast, before being appointed Student (Fellow and Tutor) at Christ Church, Oxford. He was later to hold the post of Reader in English Literature of Oxford University and upon his retirement was made an Emeritus Professor. Whilst never wanting to leave his beloved Oxford permanently, he did manage to fit into his busy schedule a visiting Professorship at the University of Washington and was also honoured by other Universities in the UK.

  Stewart wrote many works under his own name, including twenty-one works of fiction (which contained the highly acclaimed quintet entitled ‘A Staircase in Surrey’, centred primarily in Oxford, but with considerable forays elsewhere, especially Italy), several short story collections, and over nine learned works on the likes of Shakespeare, Kipling and Hardy. He was also a contributor to many academic publications, including a major section on modern writers for the Oxford History of English Literature. He died in 1994, the last published work being an autobiography: ‘Myself and Michael Innes’.

  J.I.M. Stewart’s fiction is greatly admired for its wit, plots and literary quality, whilst the non-fiction is acknowledged as being definitive.

  PART ONE

  THE SLEEPING PRINCESS

  CHAPTER I

  Oxford, England, was the address on the label that hung from Quail’s suitcase. It hadn’t caught his eye on the steamer; he noticed it for the first time now, when the lurch with which the train left Paddington set the label swaying on the opposite rack. The label was an old-fashioned leather affair. It suggested – the thought came suddenly to Quail – a muzzle, through which the white slip of inserted cardboard showed like two rows of threatening teeth.

  Quail reminded himself that Oxford, England, was a perfectly proper address on the baggage of a citizen of the United States. There was no reason why the sight of it should set him to the manufacture of alarming images. A quickened pulse, indeed, was natural. Even an Englishman, elderly like himself, would own to that when making again after many years this once so pregnant journey. Long ago, these quiet reaches of the Thames had been exciting because of all the things one largely conjectured might happen at the end of them. If they were exciting now, it was simply because of the memory of that. Nothing but reminiscences, ghostly re-enactments, was in question. When past fifty, a return to one’s university – to one of one’s universities – rings up no curtain except in the interior theatre and upon a costume piece. There couldn’t, as a man might say, be a story in it.

  Yet he was coming to Oxford not merely in the nostalgic mood. That, taken anything like neat, was something he would distrust. He didn’t expect contemporary drama, but at least he had a present design. His visit would have a result – so he allowed himself to hope – on the practical plane. It would conclude, if all went well, with an event which could be registered on the simplest of instruments – say a pair of scales. There would be a small but definite movement of physical objects in space.

  No doubt there would be a need to take new bearings. Oxford couldn’t be quite unchanged. The social revolution in these islands – commonly referred to by his peregrinating countrymen with sombre reticence as “the conditions” – must have marked the place. But it didn’t appear greatly to have marked the environs of London. As the train moved out through the grimed hideous tenements here and there beflagged with uncertainly cleansed washing, Quail had a sense of time standing still. And this sense was strengthened by his more immediate surroundings. It was donkey’s years since he had been in an English train, for none of his more recent transatlantic trips had taken him outside a capital into which he had been directly dropped, more or less, from the stratosphere. Now, a single wriggle assured him that what he reposed upon dated from Great Western days. This first-class carriage stuck to the pre-scientific approach to comfort. There was an assumption that physical ease could be managed without push-buttons and levers. The compartment had the smell not of medicated air but of smoke and dust and tobacco – the expensive tobacco of prosperous businessmen. If anything had changed, it appeared to be the speed at which it was proposed to travel.

  England, never exactly fast-moving, was decidedly slowing down. Of this proposition, which he frequently enough heard advanced, here seemed to be a present instance. For Quail remembered that when, a serious and expectant Rhodes Scholar, he first made this journey, the train had abbreviated his suspense by breaking the hour. Nothing of the sort was promised today. On the other hand, that far-off train had been crowded – he had come up, he recalled, on the Friday immediately preceding Full Term – whereas this one had space to spare. In his own compartment, there was only one other passenger. And even he appeared to need some explaining. Perhaps it was the social revolution that had put him here. But Quail doubted it. Egalitarian movements are not largely on record as doing much for tramps. And he supposed this passenger to be that.

  The tramp had dropped straight to sleep. His mouth was open and his eyes were closed. This was as much as Quail, seated diagonally across the compartment, allowed himself to notice. Egalitarian feelings of his own would have made him dislike being detected in what might be misinterpreted as a challenging scrutiny. Indeed, he now reached for a newspaper he had bought at Paddingto
n, his idea being to get well behind it if the ticket-collector arrived and vindicated the sanctity of first-class travel by turning the old creature into the corridor. But having effected – in a full consciousness of its ignobility – this tentative precaution, Quail found himself looking at the old creature’s boots. One of them was puzzling. The sole had come away from the upper – a state of affairs orthodox in a tramp. But an ingenious repair had been contrived by means of a sort of swaddling operation with a lavishly used roll of transparent cellulose tape. Moreover, on the seat beside the tramp lay a hat. It was, Quail realised, a black hat. His first impression of it as being a green hat was owing to a pervasive incrustation of mildew or mould. But this object had also been resourcefully cared for. The brim was at one point severed from the crown. And a repair – effective even if unusual – had been achieved through the deft application of a small but powerful spring paper-clip.

  Quail now ventured to shift his gaze to the principal garment in which the tramp was enfolded. This struck him as having less the character of an overcoat than of a decayed, yet still formidable, fortification. In the main an affair of massive abraded surfaces, it had here and there recesses and subsidences, which suggested some slow shrinkage of the life within, and in which one somehow expected grasses to have taken root and the nests of wild-fowl to have niched themselves. Not that it could be called ragged. Apart from a tendency of the lining to depend in strips from its lower circumference, it might have been described as in tolerably good structural repair. But there was no doubt that it was grubby. Just over the slumbering tramp’s left knee, in particular, there showed a large irregular brown stain. It suggested a mishap with a cup of coffee in some railway refreshment-room very long ago.

  The brown stain disturbed Quail oddly. He was inclined to suppose that this could be accounted for only upon esoteric psychological principles. The particular shape of the stain must have touched off some sinister process of association in his unconscious mind. There was a technique, he believed, of investigating nervous distresses by determining the sufferer’s imaginative responses to a series of blots. What this blot suggested to him was the continent of Australia rotated clockwise through an angle of ninety degrees. The discovery was not enlightening. Australia, he was convinced, was an area of the world’s surface with which his subliminal self held no conversation whatever.

  Suddenly, and with the effect of a forgotten name or date slipping back into the mind, he realised that what was troubling him was not a trick of association but an assertion of previous acquaintance. He had seen the brown stain before. This discovery was immediately followed by the familiar but uncomfortable sense of knowing just what was going to happen next. The tramp was about to wake up, reach into a capacious pocket, and produce a crumpled paper bag.

  Precisely this now happened. The tramp peered into the bag, inserted a finger and thumb, and then glanced swiftly across the compartment. Quail became aware of a small lively presence lurking behind the folds of the grey battered overcoat, the impression being of a preternaturally ancient squirrel counting its acorns as it peered out between the limbs of a tree. And almost at once the squirrel spoke. It was like an irruption from the world of Beatrix Potter. The voice was high, quavering, cultivated, and curiously gay. “Ginger nuts,” it said.

  Quail’s disturbance of mind evaporated. This was – of course it was – old Dr Stringfellow. Dr Stringfellow had been that – to Quail’s young mind quite unequivocally old – long, long ago. And his overcoat had been old too. Quail had often noticed it, coffee stain and all, during chilly lectures in Hilary Term, when it had regularly appeared beneath Dr Stringfellow’s equally old gown. It had changed less than its owner. And the biscuits surely represented a major innovation – a concession, it must be feared, to the passing of the years. For Quail seemed to remember that the paper bags had formerly contained – or at least been reputed to contain – a small but succulent species of pork pie.

  “Good afternoon, Quail.” As Dr Stringfellow produced, in a manner wholly casual, this incredible feat of memory, he hospitably extended the bag across the compartment. “Do you take the four forty-five as a regular thing?”

  “Good afternoon, sir.” Quail, having accepted a ginger nut, found himself surprising Dr Stringfellow by cordially shaking him by the hand. It was one of the points – he now remembered – to remember. According to one school of Oxford thought, you sometimes shook hands during the vacation but never during term. According to another, you shook hands with any given individual once in a lifetime and once only. Perhaps Dr Stringfellow was of this second persuasion. But at least his surprise was genial – as might be that of an anthropologist with whom a Hottentot had deftly contrived to rub noses. “The four forty-five?” Quail essayed a nibble at his ginger nut before taking up the question that had been addressed to him. “It’s a long time, I’m afraid, since I’ve taken any train to Oxford at all.” He made a second attempt on the ginger nut. It was adamantine. He had a fleeting fantastic suspicion that it was cast in metal – which would mean that his companion had entered a second childhood delighting in explosive cigarettes, rubber spiders, and rapidly soluble spoons.

  “You’ve gone down? But of course you have. I remember very well. A pity. You wouldn’t think of changing your mind?” Dr Stringfellow, who had now put on a pair of ancient steel-rimmed spectacles, glanced at Quail with sudden extreme sharpness.

  “It’s rather late in the day for that.” Quail was amused. “It happened, you know, twenty-five years ago.”

  “Exactly.” Dr Stringfellow was unimpressed. “Twenty-five years. I’d have put it at twenty-six. But I recall the occasion. We were hoping that you might remain. And then off you went in a great hurry.”

  “That’s true.” Quail was astonished at the accuracy with which this antediluvian scholar was able to mark, on a map itself now grown, as it were, shadowy beneath the Deluge, so minute and evanescent a spot as a stray American student must constitute. “It was certainly in a hurry, and I deeply regretted it. But my father had died, you see, and there were responsibilities. A business to take hold of. Several businesses, as a matter of fact.”

  “Quite so, quite so.” Dr Stringfellow spoke dismissively, as one who converses daily with those controlling industrial empires. “And are you in a hurry still – or are you coming into residence with some sense of leisure?” Dr Stringfellow again contrived his effect of sudden sharp scrutiny. “Are you a bachelor?”

  Quail found himself at a loss. It had not occurred to him to dignify his present pilgrimage to Oxford as any sort of coming into residence. And the second question struck him as awkwardly ambiguous. It might be directed to his marital status. Or it might merely be designed to settle whether or not he had ever taken a degree. On this last point he ventured a guess. “I’m not married,” he said, “and my time is, to a reasonable extent, my own to command. But I don’t know that I shall stay very long. It depends on how things go.”

  To this Dr Stringfellow made no reply, applying himself instead to mastication. The ginger nuts gave him no difficulty; he might have been chewing gum. As the silence continued, Quail wondered if he had spoken too casually. It was certainly true that his stay need not be extended. The history of his second encounter with Oxford could be short. On the other hand, his project was scarcely to be put through quite with the celerity – nor yet wholly in the spirit – of a business trip. It was his consciousness of this, it was his desire to get into the right, the decent tempo, that had brought him to England by water, and that was responsible for his having in addition to the suitcase in front of him, a sizeable trunk in the guard’s van.

  “How things go?” Dr Stringfellow’s silence had been meditative. It was during a thoughtful scrutiny of Quail’s clothes that he propounded a further question. “It’s the railways, I think, that you and your family own over there?”

  Quail laughed. “Not quite all of them. But I’ve certainly had a lot to do with railroads since I saw Oxford last. Shall I fi
nd the place much changed?”

  “I fear, my dear fellow, that you may.” Dr Stringfellow took another peep inside his paper bag, and his tone grew sombre. He might have been reflecting that even a ginger nut is a poor substitute for a well-baked pork pie. “There is, if you ask me, a growth of intolerance among the younger men – the younger dons, that is to say. They tend, it appears to me, more and more to congregate in corners, plotting petty subversions and sharing small primitive jokes. It is a pity. The atmosphere of what, at school, we used to call the junior day-room is scarcely conducive to good general conversation.”

  “I suppose not.” Quail glanced curiously at his companion. “But in any society, I guess, people tend to sort themselves out according to age. I don’t see that it constitutes intolerance.”

  “It leads to their wanting to change things. Instead of making knowledge, which is confoundedly hard, they propose, you know, simply to shove things around. And that – whether it be a question of an examination statute or a common room bookcase – is a good deal easier, if you ask me. It is surely to be deplored that scholars should adopt the attitudes and admit the passions of bishops and civil servants. You agree with me?”

  Quail, who felt that the passions of bishops, at least, was a subject taking him well out of his depth, offered a noncommittal murmur.

  “Yet intolerance is decidedly something one must be tolerant about.” Discovering this ultimate in liberal sentiment, Dr Stringfellow regained his buoyant nervous tone. “And particularly in the junior people. A measure of intolerance, after all, gives them what they need – their cutting edge. Only one doesn’t, indeed, care to be cut oneself – in either sense. And I myself have been coming – just lately, you know, I have been coming – a little to feel the approach of unregarded age. How is it that Shakespeare describes it?”